‘One country two armies’ situation ends in Nepal
‘One country two armies’ situation ends in Nepal! unfortunately,it does NOT.Unlike blustered by the people of the Special Committee for the Supervision, Integration,and Rehabilitation, peace process has not come to conclusion instead the "ignominious recruitment" of Maoist combatants into Nepalese Army has (more or less) led the whole peace process astray. As devised earlier, the intent of peace process was to minimize any prospect of arm struggle.Contrarily,the integration process has failed even to acknowledge this. The pundits of conflict management politicized the whole peace process. Their prolonged squabble on numbers and rank of combatants in integration was just bargaining chip for bigger pie.Maoists had interest in gaining high hand in army structure while non-Maoists hastened to dissolve the former's "P.L.A". What about the 2/3 of politically-indoctrinated guerrilla-warfare-trained Maoist combatants?Who guarantees that they won't take up arms again,that they won't be used again?
‘One country two armies’ situation ends in Nepal! unfortunately,it does NOT.Unlike blustered by the people of the Special Committee for the Supervision, Integration,and Rehabilitation, peace process has not come to conclusion instead the "ignominious recruitment" of Maoist combatants into Nepalese Army has (more or less) led the whole peace process astray. As devised earlier, the intent of peace process was to minimize any prospect of arm struggle.Contrarily,the integration process has failed even to acknowledge this. The pundits of conflict management politicized the whole peace process. Their prolonged squabble on numbers and rank of combatants in integration was just bargaining chip for bigger pie.Maoists had interest in gaining high hand in army structure while non-Maoists hastened to dissolve the former's "P.L.A". What about the 2/3 of politically-indoctrinated guerrilla-warfare-trained Maoist combatants?Who guarantees that they won't take up arms again,that they won't be used again?
No comments:
Post a Comment